|
d g i V i s t a
. o r g . . . "Making
the Fifth
Estate the Fourth." |
Sparky!
the Political Blog |
|||
| dali global intelligentsia |
expressive
educational
enlightening transformative potent and giving ubuntu |
Education Fiction Personal Poetry Politics |
||
|
|
||||
Sparky! Politics at dgiVista.orgQuick, sparky political digs, crabs, and short bursts of sometimes thunderous applause.Please contact me at the email address below if you too would like to have each new blog entry emailed to you. For free, even. Archives are at the bottom. The email icon at the end of each post allows you to forward each entry to someone else. Go to town! Archives2004.04 2004.05 2004.06 2004.07 2004.09 2004.10 2004.11 2004.12 2005.01 2005.04 2005.05 2005.06 2005.07 Tuesday, November 16, 2004Real Soap, "Real" Beauty, "Real" Feminism?
Dove soap's Campaign for Real Beauty is very interesting to me. I've seen the billboards and I appreciate their attempt to legitimize beauty beyond what we're brainwashed with in Maxim, Playboy, Baywatch and the like.
But I'm not so sure about Dove. I'm not so sure that even if their soap products, etc. are stupendous that I respect them co-opting a legitimate debate for corporate ends. True, they may be spurring some to expand their sense of beauty, but underlying Maxim, Playboy, Baywatch and Dove is the consumerist necessity of defining for us what we want so we can buy it from one company, as opposed to the other. So cynically--or perhaps realistically--Dove is merely engaging us in clever market segmentation: they are the soap for people who don't wish to recognize any legitimacy in stereotyped constructions of beauty. How post-modern of them. Then there's the Dove Self-Esteem Fund, that helps "girls all over the world to overcome everyday beauty pressures." Right. Again, Dove may be god's gift to women's dermitological health, but do we really want Dove being in charge of this dialogue? They sure want to be in charge of it. Great viral PR [we're encouraged to invite friends to the website]. In fact, instead of them actually having to advertise to you about how great they are in funding socially-conscious projects, we end up seeking that information from them. It'll stick to us better that way because we want to know about them. The cosmetics and health products industries are prime culprits in destroying women's self-esteem. How ironic--or socially healing?--of Dove to try to rectify this. Either way, they will probably sell more soap. Happily for Dove, 2 of the 5 items listed as success stories for the Self-Esteem Fund are photo exhibitions they created themselves. It may be terrible to rub this in, but Dove is even doing market research on us as we navigate their site. In providing information about their motives [thoroughly altruistic sounding, of course--remember, they're on our side!], they ration the information so that we need to click to further screens for elaboration. They end up with a good sense of just how much each of us is interested in various depths of information. This information about us can be combined with a log of all pages we visit on their site [including the time we spend between clicking through pages] to give them a pretty wonderful sense of how much we care to know. Heck, even I track my access logs to examine reading/clicking habits on my site [anonymously, though, because I collect nothing about yall but IP numbers]; I've got to believe Dove does it too. Worse still, if we actually log in and supply demographic data when we create our profile on the site [assuming a certain percentage of those signing up are not lying], they get an even broader sense of us, despite their claim that they only collect navigation data anonymously and in the aggregate. And what is our benefit from all this? Better soap? Better self-esteem through Dove products? Even more cynically, perhaps, how many of the people taking part in the definition of beauty discussions on that site are Dove lackeys spinning conversation in defined PR areas? If I were running this campaign, I wouldn't leave the discussion board completely at the mercy of regular normal people without having my branding agents subtly making it all worthwhile. So then I dug through my hard drive to find the August 1992 update of the soc.feminism faq that defines various flavours of feminism to see which ones would support Dove's campaign and which ones would condemn it. The updated faq of Different Flavours of Feminism is more useful. Applying each flavour to Dove's campaign will require great thought: more than I can accomplish without a few more days/weeks of mental meandering. [Maybe in the meantime I'll write something in here about the disaster of w.Caesar's election. Or not] For now, until you follow the link to the full faq with descriptions of the flavours, here they are, listed: Amazon Feminism Anarcho-Feminism Cultural Feminism Erotic Feminism Eco-Feminism Feminazi Feminism and Women of Color Individualist, or Libertarian Feminism Lesbianism Liberal Feminism Marxist and Socialist Feminism Material Feminism Moderate Feminism 'pop-feminism' Radical Feminism Separatists Men's Movements: Feminist Men's Movement Men's Liberation Movement Mythopoetic Men's Movement The New Traditionalists The Father's Movements Questions, comments, feedback, gripes, thunderous applause? Email me...use the address at the bottom of the page. Please email me at the email address below if you would like to have each new blog entry emailed to you. For free, even. Archives are below these 10 most recent posts.
Comments:
Post a Comment
Links to this post: Archives2004.04 2004.05 2004.06 2004.07 2004.09 2004.10 2004.11 2004.12 2005.01 2005.04 2005.05 2005.06 2005.07 |
![]()
Rumsfeld
and The Grinch?
|
|||
|
dali
global intelligentsia Vista dot org
|
|
|
dali
|
Because sometimes the surreal is the only viable approach |
|
global
|
The big picture is the only picture |
|
intelligentsia
|
Since we're all in this together, let's put our minds together |
|
Vista
|
We're dead without a vision. What's yours? |
|
dot
org
|
We're no dot com |
Email me: NotUninspired at Yahoo dot com
Stephen Buckley, CEO of dgiVista.org [un]Limited
You must be of legal drinking age [in your jurisdiction] to enter this site. If you are too young, please exit here.
CEO = [Chief Entropic Officer]
ISSN 1198-7634
This gravitational colour scheme is brought to you by the letter L, the
number 12,
the red wheelbarrow and the palm at the end of the mind.